Douglas Adams, Bridges Place, London 1995.

Tuesday, 27 April 2010 The thing that immediately struck me when I met Douglas Adams was that he was almost the double of a friend of mine, another photographer called Gordon. Not only facially, but he was the same (large) size and had the same sort of dress sense and a similar gait. It was uncanny. As soon as I got home that day, I rang Gordon and told him that I’d just met his doppelgänger. “Oh yes” he said “everyone tells me that.”

I didn’t think much more about it until a couple of years later when I was hanging out with Gordon at the Cannes Film Festival. He and I had just got into the year’s glitziest party and we were both sitting, just inside the entrance, watching all the big movie stars arrive and get pounced on by a huge gaggle of the most highly accredited paparazzi.

We were just about to go off and get a drink when we saw Mick Jagger arrive, together with a huge entourage. There was a big commotion as he waltzed past the paps, completely ignoring them (including people like Dave Hogan, who he must have known personally). Then he did something very odd. He saw us, walked straight over and embraced Gordon like a long lost son. He asked him how he was, made a big show of it all, then turned on his heels and walked off again. Gordon was dumbstruck. And if you knew Gordon, you’d know how remarkable that is in itself. He’d never met Mick Jagger before and had never much liked the Rolling Stones’ music. So we were both completely mystified.

Afterwards the only explanation either of us could think of was that Mick Jagger had mistaken Gordon for Douglas Adams.

The Slits, Chelsea 1978.

Monday, 26 April 2010 This photograph dates from a time when I was really just a rock fan, playing at being a photographer. But I’d started to look for bands and musicians to persuade to let me photograph them. With or, more usually, without any good reason. My day job was that of an advertising agency art director and, in that business, you learn to develop a certain amount of chutzpah. Back in the ‘60s and ‘70s all admen thought they were the masters of the universe anyway. So one day I rang up the Slits’ office (God only knows how I got the number) and got straight through to Vivienne Albertine. So I just nonchalantly asked her if I could do a photo shoot with her band. Now, I’m sure the very first thing she would have asked me was “what’s the photo for?” I honestly can’t remember exactly what I said. Maybe I lied, I don’t remember. At that point I’d had only about half a dozen photographs published, so I was a real novice. But certainly a novice with a lot of front.

Unbelievably, Vivienne sounded interested, came into my office in Mandeville Place and we had coffee and I managed to persuade her. Then I rang up a professional photographer friend, Lorenz Zatecky, and asked him if I could borrow his Chelsea studio one evening and, er, whilst he was at it, could I sort of borrow his assistant too. And so it was that I came to shoot this session. Eventually one of the shots (of Ari Up falling over backwards) was published in the The Face.

The photograph above has never been published.

Tony and Freddie, Southwark 2000.

Sunday, 25 April 2010 This is a portrait of Tony Lambrianou (RIP) and Freddie Foreman commissioned by Vox magazine.  Freddie Foreman who is, incidentally, the father of the actor Jamie Foreman, was once known as ‘Brown Bread Fred.‘  If you don’t know your cockney rhyming slang, the significance of this nickname won’t be obvious but save to say they were both once rather dangerous men.  They were both associates of the Kray firm and they both served serious prison time for their involvement in the murder of Jack ‘The Hat’ McVitie. 

I photographed them around Freddie’s old manor, in the area south of Southwark Bridge in London. I went on a pub crawl with them afterwards and they were very amusing company, with endless stories of the old days and all their friends, euphemistically known as “the chaps.” They were nice but, even in their dotage, I’d be lying if I said that they were completely devoid of any hint of menace. If I’d have met them in their pomp, in the ‘60s, I’d have run a mile.

The thing is, back then, they might not have let me.

Lupe Max, San Francisco 1990.

Saturday, 24 April 2010 I once photographed the lead singer of a San Francisco girl band called Lupe Max (the name of the band now escapes me).  She was very beautiful with long, wavy (and at that time red) hair, tattoos and lots of earrings.  She also had earrings in places where there were not necessarily any ears.  Her small house had one main room that was packed full of an array of the most incredible, hippy dippy junk and there were feather boa's, whips, Nazi helmets and all sorts besides.  It was hard to find anywhere sensible to even sit down.  She collected animals but, apart from her pet white wolf, a boa constrictor and a couple of caged tarantula’s, they were all dead animals.  Not stuffed animals, you understand, but squashed road kill she’d just up peeled off the road.  She had 3 or 4 cats, a couple of dogs and several others that were way,way past any sort of forensic identification whatsoever.  They were all laying around and propped up as a sort of household decoration.  It seems that she just liked the way they looked, all brown and decayed and disgusting looking.  I’d been there about an hour, I’d finished photographing her and I was just packing up when a pile of old her clothes in the corner stirred and some guy emerged, stood up, rubbed his eyes, looked at me accusingly and stormed out of the room.  “Oh, that’s okay" she said "he's my boyfriend.”  Until that point, I’d thought we were in the room alone.  I made my excuses and left.  She lived in a dangerous part of Potrero Hill, but I felt safer outside.

Actually no, I was just kidding about the last bit.  She was very sweet it was just all the dead stuff that spooked me a bit.  The last time I saw her, about a year after the photograph above was taken, she'd cut off all her beautiful hair and she looked like a changed woman.  I met her for a coffee on Market Street.  She looked and sounded really scared.  Apparently she'd been involved in some sort of business deal "south of the border" that had gone wrong and she thought the other party might be out to get her.  She was quite a hard core biker and would not have scared easily.  I know a little more than I'm saying but I obviously can't write down it here.  It was certainly not good.

I haven't seen her since.

I really hope she was okay because she was a great talent and a real one-off.  If you know where she is now, or know anyone who knows where she is, please send her my regards.

Skinheads.

Friday, 23 April 2010 Almost all of my photographs of skinheads were taken between the summer of 1979 and the summer of 1984, and the vast majority in the earlier of those years.  They were taken either in London or in some of the seaside towns easily accessible from London.  Some first appeared in a show called 'Skinheads' at the Chenil Studio Gallery in Chelsea, in October 1980.

Back then, I wasn't a professional photographer, (in truth, not even a particularly keen amateur) and to begin with, I hadn't intended to start photographing skinheads at all. Rather, they found me.

In early '79 I was already engaged in what eventually turned out to be a lengthy photographic study of the New Romantics (though back then they were not known as such).

I'd been documenting this nascent scene in the Soho nightclub 'Billy's' and, one evening, a group of about half-a-dozen skinheads turned up.  They saw me taking photographs and one of them asked me if I'd like to take some photos of them too.  They seemed pretty friendly and not at all camera shy.  I took a few snaps, we got talking and Wally suggested I go with the whole gang on one of their Bank Holiday jaunts to the seaside.

That was what led, eventually, to five years of photographing skinheads.  In those five years I got to know some of the skinheads quite well and liked many of them.  Almost all were polite and courteous to me.  I saw virtually no violence, just a handful of scuffles.  If I had seen any fighting, I certainly wouldn't have photographed it for the simple reason that I wouldn't have wanted the presence of my camera to affect the situation.

Other than that, there was no self-censorship.  I wanted to remain objective (although I later came to believe that to be impossible).  Susan Sontag famously wrote that "the photographer is not simply the person who records the past, but the one who invents it."  I certainly hope this isn't the case with my photos.  They were all chosen to be displayed on the basis of two criteria: if I thought it was a good photograph; or if I thought it helped to tell the story.

Back in the early '80s, I turned down a couple of opportunities to turn the photographs into a book. I didn't want either to glorify the skinhead lifestyle or become an apologist for them.  And I still don't.  My political and social views were not the same as most of the skinheads of that time but I hope the photographs can now speak for themselves.

Update 14/7/14 - my book has now been published by Onibus -

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/178305171X/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_img?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AF4WPYXJPJ57&coliid=I8OV5L4XTO2WG

livepage.apple.com

Jarvis Cocker, London 1994.

Thursday, 22 April 2010 I’m not the sort of photographer that will turn up to a photo shoot and think that I’m automatically going to be able to stare deep into a subject’s psyche and, on the basis of a one-hour meeting (and sometimes a lot less), be able to say something deeply profound about them. Some photographers can do it.  Yousuf Karsh or Arnold Newman, certainly. But IMHO an awful lot of photographers just think they can do it. I don’t. I think that approach can often just be asinine. Because, besides anything else, some people (especially actors and politicians) are no doubt very adept at disguising certain realities about themselves.

So, my modus operandi has become, over the years, the opposite if anything. I try to free my mind of anything I may know about the subject and allow something to just fall into my lap out of the ether. The criticism of this approach, of course, is that it’s superficial. As a young photographer, I must admit I thought this myself and would always strive for a great meaning. But experience eventually came to show me that sometimes profundity can come more easily in the casual, unthought-through stuff. And, in all honesty, when you’re not even thinking about anything. That’s the great beauty of the form.

I didn’t even see this shot until the film was developed. I don’t remember him standing there rolling his eyes back into his head. But, for some reason, I liked this shot more than all the others that I shot when I was really trying.

I suppose I could describe the method (if you can really call it a method) as being open to the serendipitous.

Incidentally, this photograph was taken in Carburton Street in the exact spot that Boy’s George’s infamous squat used to be. They’d pulled the building down by this point though.

 

Nick Cave, Southwark 1984.

Thursday, 22 April 2010 I suppose Nick Cave is close to being the perfect subject for any photographer. For a start he’s particularly photogenic. And he seems to like photography (his wife Susie Bick was once a top model). Also, although he’d undoubtedly deny it, he actually seems to like to have his photograph taken. So he’ll usually go the extra mile to help you get an interesting image. Not that that’s particularly hard with Nick, since he always engages with the camera so well. Not to say gurns, occasionally. This photograph was from the second session I ever did with him.

Sinead O’Connor, Battersea, London 1988.

Wednesday, 21 April 2010 I decided to do this blog after the encouragement and support of my website guru Rupert Field.  We reckon that it'd be as good a place as any for me to write about and explain how some of my photographs came about.

I’d also like to thank my son for coming up with the title for my blog, I just hope he’s not taking the mick.

Anyway, I'm starting with one of my favourites - of Sinead O'Connor, photographed in Battersea in 1988.

A couple of weeks before this shot was taken, I’d got a commission from the NME to photograph Sinead in Liverpool. The writer and I went up there and we were booked into the same hotel as Sinead and her manager. In the evening we all met and went out for a drink in order to get to know one another. Later, long after me and the writer were tucked up in bed, Sinead had gone out again, got involved in an altercation with a nightclub bouncer and been given a black eye.

Anyway, in the morning we awoke to find a still very upset Sinead and, understandably, she was unwilling to do any photos. In those days, I thought it was paramount for me never to go home without getting “the shot”, whatever the reason, so I offered to photograph her from one side, so that the black eye would be in shadow. But, in all honesty, that would have not helped either of us much and she wouldn’t do it anyway. It was agreed that once her face had recovered the photo shoot would be rescheduled.

I heard nothing for a few weeks and then it was just my luck to be given a date when I was due to be in LA on another job. I was desperate not to lose out, so I figured that, if I flew back from LA and got a cab from the airport straight to the location in Battersea (where Sinead was making a pop video) I could still do it. This shot was taken soon after I arrived. But initially I wasn’t satisfied. Sinead then told me that if I waited around for a while, we could do some more photos later on. I was tired but I waited around for her all day until the evening. At which point she just upped and left without saying a word.

So, why am I doing it myself?

Monday, 19 April 2010 Okay, first off I want to explain why I decided to withdraw all my images from the various photo libraries they were with and why I then decided to market my work myself.

There were two reasons.  

First I figured that, in the digital age, I might be able to do a better job myself anyway.  The majority of my rock star/celebrity images were with London Features International and, in truth, I'd long thought that they weren't really the right picture agency for me.  But I felt somewhat obligated to the owner, John Halsall, who I really liked.  When he put LFI into receivership in 2008, that gave me a bit of a kick in the pants and an excuse to sever my links with them.  Although LFI quickly found a perfectly decent buyer, my mind was made up.  When I went into LFI's offices to retrieve my work, and I saw just how awful some of the dupes they'd been using were, I wished I'd made the move a lot sooner.

The second reason I decided to market my work myself was that I thought that it would be a very good idea if I had more control over the images that were out there.  That I didn't have previously was entirely my own fault.  But until a few years ago, I was flying around the world so much and working so hard that I just didn't have the time.  For instance, when I worked at the Glastonbury Festival (throughout most of the '90s), I'd drive home after the last band had finished on the Saturday night, process and print the black and whites during the early hours, deliver them to the NME offices in the morning and then drive straight back to the Festival.  It was great fun but not always conducive to great work.  Oftentimes I'd shoot so much that I'd find myself dumping armfuls of of prints and transparencies on people's desks and then run off to get to the next job.  Inevitably, sometimes the best images didn't always get used.  I suppose the people on whose desks I dumped my images were busy people too.  So, now that I have more time to think, I'm gradually going through everything, re-apraising and re-editing and picking things out that often I just didn't see at the time.  I also want to refocus on what I always thought was my main USP - dramatic portraiture.

So, that was the genesis of me putting my archive online.